Q )-8 (M)-1.9 (onsa)2.8 (nt)-1.9 (o ot)-2.9 (he)4.8 (r)3 (w)1.1 (is)-3 (e)3 ( )]TJ Q 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm f >> ET 574.8 791.16 0.71 -791.16 re -48.829 -12 Td [(a)4 (f)3.8 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (r)3 ( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2.8 (a)3.1 (nt)-1.1 (o )-10.9 (r)3 (e)4.8 (c)-6.8 (e)4.8 (i)-1.9 (ve)3.9 (d )-10.7 (EP)-1.4 (A)1.1 (\222)3 (s )-1.8 (J)-12 (ul)-11.1 (y)29.9 ( 29, 1985 l)-1.9 (e)3.9 (t)-1.9 (t)-12 (e)3 (r)3 ( \()3.9 (MON)-7.7 (G)-7.1 (L)10 (Y)2.9 (04269006-)-7.8 (07\))3 (. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. /Length 148 0 R f /TT0 12 Tf /TT0 12 Tf >> >> (a) Any documents or category of documents produced in response to a demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling shall be identified with the specific request number to which the documents respond. /Length 154 0 R T* >> /Contents [104 0 R 105 0 R 106 0 R] )Tj >> << 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 314.4112 86.2909 Tm [(D)2 (E)-13 (N)1.1 (IE)-3.1 (S)]TJ If you are not producing documents when your responses come due, state when the documents will be produced. /Length 149 0 R I noticed a few things regarding privilege logs. /Rotate 0 -73.07 -24 Td endstream 67.32 0 Td (13)Tj (5)Tj /PageElement 38 0 R 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] (16)Tj /TT1 12 Tf Judges have been saying it for years, and their tolerance for deaf ears is ebbing: Throw away the boilerplate. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm C.C.P. T* (22)Tj Therefore, there are no "third part[ies]" as that term is defined. [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-1.1 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 ( 1983 pa)3.1 (t)-1.8 (hol)-1.2 (og)-10.9 (y)20.8 ( )19.2 (r)3 (e)4.8 (po)-9.9 (r)2.1 (t)-1.1 ( c)3.1 (onduc)14 (t)-2 (e)4 (d b)10 (y)20.8 ( B)6.2 (i)-1.1 (o/)-2 (d)-10.8 (y)29.9 (na)4.8 (m)-2.7 (i)-2 (c)4.7 (s)-1.7 ( f)3.7 (or)3 ( )10 (S)-4.8 (t)-1.9 (ud)10.7 (y)19.2 ( )-9.1 (B)6.1 (D)2 (N)2 (-)]TJ endstream (7)Tj A request for such a log is unreasonable and unduly burdensome in light of the work product doctrine, governmental deliberative process privilege, and other privileges protecting such internal documents from discovery. T* Furthermore, Defendant has access to the addresses and/or telephone numbers of those persons listed on Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures and can seek information by addressing formal or informal discovery directly from those entities. [(ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.575684 36 cm [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s )]TJ -78.23 -24 Td << Responding party objects that the request seeks documents already in plaintiff's possession custody or control. endobj )-3.002 (\222)-4.297 (S)1.697 ( )-1.898 (R)3.203 (E)-14.408 (S)1.707 (P)-10.201 (ON)-2.701 (SES )-3.203 (T)-15.502 (O )-2.902 (P)-10.201 (L)8.504 (A)10.1 (I)-4.197 (NT)-16.305 (I)-5.402 (F)1.707 (F)1.797 (\222)8.695 (S)1.807 ( )-15 (F)1.697 (I)-4.297 (R)-8.705 (S)1.707 (T)-14.408 ( )-2.992 (R)4.297 (E)-4.398 (QU)-1.707 (E)-5.201 (S)2.6 (T)-15.392 (S )-1.506 (F)1.697 (OR)3.504 ( )-2.902 (AD)-1.697 (M)-3.303 (I)-5.402 (S)-9.197 (SI)-3.002 (ON)-1.697 (S)-11.998 ( )]TJ f [(i)-1.1 (s )-62.9 (l)-2 (i)-2 (st)-3.1 (e)3 (d )-49 (a)3.9 (s )-222.6 (N)1.9 (o. [(, t)-1.1 (o pl)-2 (a)3.1 (i)-1.1 (nt)-2 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 (\222)3 (s )-1.8 (F)5.8 (i)-2.8 (r)3.8 (st)-4.7 ( )-9.1 (R)-3 (e)3.9 (que)3.1 (st)-2.9 (s )-2 (fo)2 (r)4.1 ( A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (ss)-3 (i)-1.2 (ons )-2 (\(\223)6.1 (R)-3 (e)4 (que)4.8 (st)-4.6 (s\224)2.7 (\))3 (. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] [(da)4 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d 9/)-2 (4/)-2 (84 f)2.9 (r)3.9 (om)-2.7 ( W)-6.1 (i)-1.1 (l)-2 (l)-2 (i)-2.8 (a)13.8 (m)-1.9 ( D)-7.1 (y)19 (kst)-2.8 (r)2.1 (a)4.8 (, P)-4.7 (h.D)1.9 (., To)1.8 (x)-8.1 (i)-2 (c)-6.9 (ol)-2 (og)-10 (y)20.8 ( )-10.8 (B)7 (r)3.8 (a)3.1 (n)-9.9 (c)4.8 (h, EP)-2.8 (A)2.8 ( H)2 (a)3.1 (z)-5 (a)-6.9 (r)3 (d E)1.8 (va)4 (l)-1.9 (ua)3.1 (t)-1.1 (i)-2 (on )]TJ /Encoding 17 0 R /Type /Font [(M)-1.8 (onsa)2.8 (nt)-12 (o )]TJ (22)Tj [(r)3 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 (a)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. -72 -24 Td (12)Tj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] PLAINTIFF'S FIND AND OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT'S INSTANT REQUEST FOR DOCS AND FIRST FIX CONCERNING INTERROGATIVES. -283.67 -24 Td << 29.4 648.61 Td General Objections The Department objects to each Interrogatory and Request insofar as it seeks production or disclosure of documents that require PWD or Raftelis Financial Consultants ("RFC") to undertake an extensive search for information not within its control or custody. If the request would take an unreasonable amount of time or money to fulfill in relation to the reasonable needs of the case (proportionality), recite specific, persuasive facts that explain why, preferably in an affidavit. T* 18 0 obj endobj In the previous blog, Start Preparing Your Motion Because with These Responses Youre Going to Court, I used the following example as a type of response I see as a Discovery Referee: Responding party hereby incorporates its general objections as if fully stated herein. Responding party objects that plaintiff has equal access to these documents. T* /CropBox [0 0 612 792] << -394.07 -24 Td >> 6. /Pages 8 0 R Among other things, the defendant objected "to the extent that [the request] is overly broad and unduly burdensome." Below is a list of scenarios with the applicable statutes and case law regarding the different responses you may, Recently I was contacted by an attorney who asked. [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ 27 0 obj (23)Tj 23.207 -24 Td (16)Tj 34 0 R 35 0 R 36 0 R 37 0 R] Continue Reading WHY THESE OBJECTIONS ARE GARBAGE. 3 to refer to "Civil Investigative Demand No. And then they dump thousands of documents on you with no rhyme or reason as to how they are organized. 0 0 612 792 re 65.4 648.61 Td << /Parent 15 0 R Plaintiff objects to this document request as overbroad, burdensome, vague, and ambiguous to the extent that it relies on the term "reflecting," which is not defined in Dentsply's Second Request for Documents and First Set of Interrogatories. /Fm1 Do )]TJ 6 regarding "statement" to the extent it relies on the undefined term "CID investigation" and the defined term "third party." q 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm In reviewing the response, it is likely you are focusing in on the fact that there are garbage objections to your request and that you werent provided a privilege log. /TT1 12 Tf 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.286072 36 cm (18)Tj 78.23 0 Td Missing that thirty-day deadline can be serious. Q 214.8 0 Td /TT1 12 Tf endobj 1 0 obj )]TJ 482.85 624.61 Td Plaintiff objects to each document request and interrogatory that is overly broad, unduly burdensome, or not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. 23 0 obj Responding party objects as it invades their and third parties right of privacy. Comply with Rule 34s requirement that you state whether any responsive materials are being withheld on the basis of the objection. Responding to such requests and interrogatory would be oppressive, unduly burdensome, and unnecessarily expensive, and the burden of responding to such requests and interrogatory is substantially the same or less for Defendant as for Plaintiff. 1304/1307 (S.D.N.Y., Feb. 18, 2017), the plaintiff requested the production of almost a decade of emails, letters, and marketing materials. and to its attorney of record: Merely said, the Sample Objections To Request For Production Of Documents Pdf Pdf is universally compatible taking into consideration any devices to read. See Bihun v. AT&T Info. [(10. [(pr)3 (e)4.8 (l)-2.7 (i)-2.1 (m)-2 (i)-1.1 (na)3 (r)-16.9 (y)29.9 ( )20.9 (sc)2.1 (i)-1.9 (e)3.1 (nt)-1.1 (i)7.1 (f)3.8 (i)-1.9 (c)13.9 ( r)3 (e)3.2 (vi)-1.1 (e)3 (w)2 ( a)4.9 (nd e)3.1 (va)4 (l)-1.9 (ua)4.8 (t)-2.8 (i)-1.9 (on of)2.8 ( st)-3.7 (ud)-9.2 (y)19.9 ( )10 (B)6.1 (D)2 (N)2 (-)3.9 (77-)3 (42)10 (0, t)-1.9 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( )-10 (g)9.9 (l)-1.9 (y)19.9 (pho)10 (sa)2.1 (t)-1.9 (e)3 ( )]TJ /Name (Headers/Footers) pD1visp[n5pL3lQtM;-a-VO}]ny]t;pcgj(q =vwVB~dm$ 4H^~#Ead4*KSj:sLGLvBSHr$$UKe;vtT='l6tdfIKq5'H=l#?JzT=A?qjf)$d?RTia&p%NoD]FYD/}@J!>1Za{JZ:LigFmhHgSLI a^xrJgr,6l_. BT /Type /Catalog (2)Tj /Annots [] [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 (, on or)2.9 ( a)4.9 (bout)-2 ( S)-4.8 (e)4.7 (pt)-2.7 (e)4.8 (m)-2 (be)4 (r)2.1 ( 4, 1985, EPA\222)4 (s)-10 ( H)1.9 (a)3.1 (z)-5 (a)3.9 (r)2.1 (d Ev)2 (a)5.9 (l)-2.8 (ua)4.8 (t)-2 (i)-2.8 (on )]TJ 0 -24 TD /Length 150 0 R 36 0 Td Mon)-1.8 (s)-1.9 (a)3 (nto)-2 ( o)-2 (t)-3 (he)3 (r)3 (w)2 (i)-1.9 (se)2.8 ( )]TJ -44.76 -24 Td stream >> [(dupl)-1.1 (i)-2 (c)3.1 (a)4 (t)-2 (i)-2 (ve)4 ( of)3.8 ( di)-2.8 (sc)2.8 (ove)4 (r)-16.9 (y)19.1 ( )-9.9 (a)4.7 (l)-1.9 (r)2.9 (e)3.2 (a)4.8 (d)-20.7 (y)20.7 ( p)-9.9 (e)3.1 (r)3 (m)-1.9 (i)-2 (t)-1.2 (t)-2 (e)3.1 (d. )]TJ -73.07 -24 Td /TT1 12 Tf )]TJ (13)Tj /Fm0 Do << Copyright 2017, American Bar Association. >> /Producer (Aspose.Pdf for .NET 10.2.0; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT) 2. 3 to refer to "Civil Investigative Demand No. /TT0 12 Tf ( )Tj 1. 13009 issued to Dentsply by the DOJ in connection with its antitrust investigation of Dentsply prior to the filing of its complaint on January 5, 1999," that definition gives no greater meaning to the phrase "CID investigation," unless it is intended to limit the definition of "third party" to those individuals and entities interviewed by Plaintiff pursuant to Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009. (14)Tj /TT0 12 Tf )Tj /TT0 12 Tf T* << 117.349 708 Td >> Plaintiff expressly reserves the right to supplement, clarify, revise, or correct any or all of the responses and objections herein, and to assert additional objections or privileges, in one or more subsequent supplemental response(s). -349.92 -24 Td [(ot)-1.1 (he)3 (r)3 (w)2.9 (i)-2.8 (se)2.9 ( )]TJ [(of)3 ( st)-4 (ud)-9.9 (y)20.7 ( B)6.1 (D)2 (N)2.9 (-)3 (77-)2.2 (42)10.8 (0 w)2 (e)3.2 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( )9.2 (c)4.8 (om)-1.9 (pou)9.1 (nd-)13 (r)3.8 (e)4 (l)-1.9 (a)13.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d. \()2.1 (M)9.9 (O)2 (N)1.1 (G)2.1 (L)21.8 (Y)2 (04276)10 (044)9.2 (\))3.8 ( )-240.7 ([)-6.2 (Th)1.8 (i)8.9 (s)-1.8 ( R)-3 (e)4.8 (q)9.1 (ue)4.9 (s)8.2 (t)-1.9 ( i)-1.2 (s )]TJ 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 81.995 679.0819 Tm 3365 -6 -24 Td (17)Tj q 344.759 55.32 Td (17)Tj T* In addition, such materials often summarize the reasons the Division conducted the interview, characterize the importance of the information learned in the interview, draw inferences based on that information, describe the author's impressions concerning the cooperativeness, credibility, or knowledge of the interviewee, and/or identify potential areas of further inquiry. [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s )]TJ (16)Tj x+ | << stream endobj [(A)1.1 (D)2 (M)4 (IT)-4.8 (S)]TJ (23)Tj [(D)1.1 (E)-2.1 (N)1.9 (IE)-4.7 (S)-4.8 ( )]TJ Such notes and/or memoranda of interviews have not been reviewed by or considered by the potential testifying expert economist. 96.837 -24 Td /TT1 12 Tf 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.575684 36 cm Here are some examples of technology you can include in your objective: Network capabilities.